A law firm for former President TrumpDonald TrumpRepublicans fret above Trump’s influence in Missouri Senate race Jan. 6 panel votes to maintain Meadows in contempt Senate confirms 1st Korean-American lady as federal appeals choose Extra‘s ex-main of workers Mark MeadowsMark MeadowsJan. 6 panel votes to hold Meadows in contempt Meadows texts show Hannity, Don Jr. desired Trump to quit Jan. 6 riot Meadows law firm argues contempt referral would be opposite to regulation Additional on Monday despatched a letter to the Dwelling pick out committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol arguing that a referral to hold his client in contempt would be “opposite to regulation.”
In a letter obtained by The Hill, Meadows legal professional George J. Terwilliger argued that a “very good-faith invocation of government privilege and testimonial immunity” does not volume to contempt of Congress, as the committee prepares to vote to keep Meadows in contempt later on Monday.
Previous week, Meadows changed study course and said he would not sit for a deposition with the committee, irrespective of his preliminary willingness to cooperate.
“The contemplated referral would be opposite to legislation simply because a very good-faith invocation of executive privilege and testimonial immunity by a former senior govt formal is not a violation of 2 U.S. Code § 192,” Terwilliger wrote.
“A referral to the Office of Justice primarily based on these kinds of an invocation would ignore the statute’s legislative background and historic application, contravene nicely-established separation of powers principles, and improperly input a criminal intent to a superior-faith actor,” the attorney extra.
On Sunday, chairman of the committee Rep. Bennie ThompsonBennie Gordon ThompsonJan. 6 panel votes to keep Meadows in contempt Meadows attorney argues contempt referral would be opposite to law Meadows explained Countrywide Guard would be current on Jan. 6 to ‘protect professional Trump people,’ investigators say Far more (D-Pass up.) shot down tips that Meadows could steer clear of a subpoena by way of asserting executive privilege, writing in a report that even while he is a previous White Residence staffer, he is not entitled to testimonial immunity.
Thompson wrote that even if Meadows had been to have this sort of an immunity, the steps that the committee is trying to find facts on would slide exterior of his duties as a White Home official.
The committee has alleged that Meadows communicated with state officers in an attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and explained to organizers of the “End the Steal” rally, which preceded the Capitol assault, that the Countrywide Guard would be current on Jan. 6 to defend “pro-Trump” men and women.
In his letter, Terwilliger included that referring a “senior presidential aide” for contempt would be “unwise for the reason that it would do wonderful damage to the institution of the Presidency, as restraint in the software of the statute more than time attests.”
“Mr. Meadows’s option to drop a deposition is an endeavor to comply with his legal obligations as a former advisor to the president,” the lawyer additional.
If the choose committee votes to hold Meadows in contempt, the evaluate would go to the entire Home to vote on irrespective of whether to refer the circumstance to the Section of Justice for possible prosecution.
Up-to-date at 5:27 p.m.